Modelling Stub · Updated 2026-05-14

Concept taxonomy (SKOS)

The hierarchical organisation of PDTF concepts — what falls under what. Expressed in SKOS for tool interoperability.

Status

This is a stub for upcoming work. The structure below is what we plan to populate; existing artefacts in source/ that feed it are cited inline.

What already exists

Proposed top-level concept scheme

flowchart TB classDef root fill:#1a4d80,color:#fff,stroke:#0b2545,stroke-width:3px; classDef l1 fill:#eef4f8,stroke:#1a4d80,color:#0b2545; PDTF[PDTF Concept Scheme]:::root TX[Transaction lifecycle]:::l1 PROP[Property]:::l1 PART[Participant]:::l1 CLAIM[Claim & Evidence]:::l1 DOC[Document]:::l1 FORM[Form]:::l1 SRCH[Search]:::l1 FIN[Financial]:::l1 LEGAL[Legal]:::l1 PDTF --> TX PDTF --> PROP PDTF --> PART PDTF --> CLAIM PDTF --> DOC PDTF --> FORM PDTF --> SRCH PDTF --> FIN PDTF --> LEGAL
Top-level SKOS concepts. Each branch is a tree of more specific concepts.

Next work

  1. Map each of the 1,557 leaf names to one of the 9 branches
  2. Build the second-level hierarchy (e.g. Property → Tenure → Leasehold)
  3. Cross-reference with BASPI / TA6 / NTS taxonomies where they exist
  4. Reconcile context-specific synonyms via skos:exactMatch / skos:closeMatch