Governance Updated 2026-05-14

Strategic alignment

The five external frameworks and strategies PDTF publicly aligns to. Each one constrains the design space — and each one is a stakeholder relationship to maintain.

Published positioning

From propdata.org.uk's About page, PDTF lists five "Strategic Alignment" partners: HMLR Strategy 2022+, DCMS/DSIT National Data Strategy, DIATF, W3C Verifiable Credentials, and the Trust Over IP Foundation.

The five alignments

flowchart LR classDef opda fill:#1a4d80,color:#fff,stroke:#0b2545,stroke-width:3px; classDef strat fill:#dbeafe,stroke:#1e40af,color:#1e3a8a; classDef tech fill:#dcfce7,stroke:#166534,color:#14532d; PDTF[Property Data
Trust Framework]:::opda HMLR[HMLR Strategy 2022+]:::strat DSIT[DSIT National Data Strategy]:::strat DIATF[DIATF
Digital Identity Trust Framework]:::strat VC[W3C Verifiable Credentials]:::tech ToIP[Trust Over IP Foundation]:::tech PDTF --- HMLR PDTF --- DSIT PDTF --- DIATF PDTF --- VC PDTF --- ToIP
PDTF's published Strategic Alignment partners.

HMLR Strategy 2022+

HM Land Registry's published business strategy from 2022 onwards. Property modernisation, digitisation of registers, Local Land Charges Programme, the national LLC service that's been rolling out council-by-council since 2018.

PDTF aligns by:

DCMS / DSIT National Data Strategy

The cross-government strategy for unlocking the power of data (originally DCMS-published, now DSIT-owned). PDTF positions itself as a sector-specific implementation of the strategy's principles — particularly around Smart Data and trusted data sharing across organisational boundaries.

DIATF — Digital Identity and Attributes Trust Framework

UK government's published trust framework for identity verification services. Run by DSIT. Property transactions involve heavy ID checks (estate agent, conveyancer, lender — each currently does their own). DIATF's stated goal is to enable "verify once, use many times" identity proofing.

PDTF aligns by:

W3C Verifiable Credentials Data Model

The W3C standard for cryptographically verifiable claims about subjects. PDTF v2.0 is being structured around VCs — every property data point is a claim, with provenance, issued by an accredited participant, presented to relying parties.

Our archive includes both VC Data Model 1.1 and 2.0 specs locally at source/08-external-references/related-w3c-specs/.

Trust Over IP Foundation

Linux Foundation project. The 4-layer governance + technical stack model that PDTF directly adopts. See the dedicated ToIP governance page.

Implicit alignments — not on the published list but worth tracking

Five more relationships that effectively shape the design space, even though OPDA hasn't formalised them as "Strategic Alignment":

Framework / standardWhy it matters
UK Open Banking (OBL → JROC) The direct precedent. propdata.org.uk's own tagline: "Open Banking for Property Data". Raidiam — Sandbox partner — built it. Borrow patterns wholesale.
EU Data Spaces / IDS-RAM European federated data ecosystem governance. Worth tracking for cross-border interoperability optionality, especially with Northern Ireland / Irish property transactions.
Schema.org Used by Rightmove, Zoopla and most UK property listing sites. PDTF semantic model should align where they overlap (Property, Place, ResidentialAddress).
FAIR data principles Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable. PDTF's "open" positioning maps directly onto FAIR.
W3C Data on the Web Best Practices (DWBP) 35 best practices for publishing data on the web. Practical checklist for PDTF's published artefacts (schemas, examples, contexts).

Alignment KPIs we could propose

To make these alignments operational rather than nominal, each should have measurable criteria. Suggested first cut: